A Defense Of Ben Affleck's Batman (Seriously)
It's official: Ben Affleck is no longer Batman. And while the internet is already busy dreaming up who his replacement should be (presumably a CGI Adam West with the voice of Kevin Conroy), we'd like to take a moment to appreciate the wonder that was Bat-fleck. Seriously!
Admittedly, Affleck seems like kind of a questionable person. There's the awkwardly creeping on female reporters, the publicly ranting about Deflategate, and the giant back tattoo that looks like something you'd expect from Harry Potter's midlife crisis. And the movies he was actually Batman in, as we've mentioned once or twice, were pretty damn stupid. But even while Holly Hunter was drinking jars of urine and Jesse Eisenberg was raving like a coked-up trust fund kid pitching a new brand of energy drink, Affleck was doing solid work.
Take his first Bat-appearance in Batman v. Superman: Dawn Of Justice. Part of the problem with that movie was that almost all of Affleck's motivation doesn't make any sense until after you've seen it. Every crazy decision Batman makes is in response to a backstory that's never explicitly discussed onscreen. As the movie progresses, we see that not only has Wayne Manor been destroyed, but also that Bruce displays a Robin costume which has been graffitied by The Joker -- the implication being that Robin was murdered.
If we take that into account, Bruce's irrational behavior starts to make way more sense, beginning with his hatred for Superman. It doesn't just come out of nowhere; Supe's brawl with Zod almost kills a kid. And seemingly orphaned her, not unlike young Bruce himself. He manages to save the tyke, but clearly that pushed a button. You can see in Affleck's rage-filled eyes that he's funneling all of his trauma into hating the shit out of Superman.
We also see Batman branding criminals, a distinctly un-Batman-like thing to do. But it's not just any criminals; it's human traffickers who have been enslaving teenagers. Again, Batman is acting out of character because kids are being hurt. When discussing Superman, Alfred remarks that the "feeling of powerlessness turns good men cruel." And it's clear he's not just talking about flying aliens.
Even the most maligned moment of the film, the infamous "Martha" scene, makes more sense in this context. Yes, it's cringey, but it also follows this same theme. Batman snaps out of his madness only after realizing that Superman too is somebody's child. It's not just about learning that their moms have the same name; it's about Batman realizing that in that moment, he's no better than the Joker.
Again, this isn't to defend the movie as a whole, but it's worth noting that Affleck had a tougher job than most freshmen Batmen. Michael Keaton was charming as Bruce Wayne and kickass as the Dark Knight, but his movies didn't call for a ton of nuance. Christian Bale got to play out an origin story from douchey yuppie to Tom-Waits-throated hero. But Affleck had to play an older Batman who has been driven to the brink of insanity by unseen trauma. It's a tough way to sell one of the most iconic characters of all time, and he did a good job. Not bad for the fifth-billed lead of Mallrats.
You (yes, you) should follow JM on Twitter, or check out the podcast Rewatchability.
Support our site with a visit to our Contribution Page. Please and thank you.
For more, check out The Internet's Debating Who's Sexier: Venom Or Ted Bundy? and The Problem With That 'Big Lebowski' Commercial.
Also, we'd love to know more about you and your interesting lives, dear readers. If you spend your days doing cool stuff, drop us a line at iDoCoolStuff at Cracked dot com, and maybe we can share your story with the entire internet.
Follow us on Facebook. Because you're the hero we NEED right now.
